I’m Sick, Tired and Disgusted….

April 17, 2008

From the ‘Boyz on the Blogz’ naive outrage at how their guy, Barry, was treated in the latest debate, hey lots of us have been saying, ‘Look out the corporatist media is just biding their time and then the ‘Clinton Rules’ will become ‘Barry’s Bylaws’. So it happened and the ‘Big Men’ of the ‘sphere are outraged.

So what?

Due to headache and other issues I will not bore you with I’m gonna play A-Lister and just give you few linkys to play with:

Uh….oh, and I do mean this….. Do you have your two weeks supply of food, water and medicine? Some ammo would not hurt.

But things are just hunkey-dorey in Miss Nancy’s House….. I suggest massive doses of this to make ya feel a bit better.

Well, at least the economy is settly down…rigtht? Right?...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight?

Looks like Barry might have some work to do on that Unity thingy……. warning if you don’t think there are some
truly enraged White People out there do not clik on this link. And no, don’t blame me. I’ve been listening to this for 45 years.

Why McSame looks so cool, calm and collected as he fumbles question after question…..

Ahnuld nears success in the ‘conservative’ ‘War on Education’ they’ve been waging for 50 years.

RiverDaughter asks, nicely, what do Obamaphiles want?

Hopefully more substance soon. Gonna be writing a lot since the number of sites I’m welcome at is…..heh…heh…shrinking


‘I think it depends on why he thinks he needs to do that.’

April 9, 2008

That’s Professor of Law at Boalt Hall School John You asking the question at the end of this clip.

Me?

I’m pretty sure President George W. Bush would have a very, very good reason to have your child’s testicles crushed for the sake of National Security.

Aren’t you?


What the ‘Progressive Movement’ does not seem to grasp….

March 29, 2008

….simple really we can’t engineer a progressive transformation of society and politics with folks writing posts like this: War is Bad for the Economy.
seems obvious but let’s unpack this post.

Let’s start with the title. At Drinking Liberally, Oaktown Chapter we long ago, 2003 or so, started calling the conflict in Iraq what it really is. It is an occupation
not a ‘War’. This is important. Words matter as some guy who keeps popping up on TeeBee keeps insisting. In this case Jeffery Feldman and George Lakoff would agree
I do believe. War is something you ‘win’ or ‘lose’ Americans don’t like to lose so by sticking with the corporatist media terminology the poster is off on the wrong foot at the very
beginning. Survey’s also show that Americans don’t like to think of our nation as ‘occupying’ another one make ‘em feel bad about themselves. Since, according to the poster, we are
trying to persuade the citizens of our point of view which is that the occupation of Iraq is a bad thing this framing is to be preferred over the use of ‘the war in Iraq’.

Read the rest of this entry »


4000 Americans Dead….

March 28, 2008

……..and the man responsible enjoys himself with the Easter Bunny…..

And while he’s doing that this is what we hear from

Senator Reid, Senate Minority Leader reid scowl.jpg

Senator Boxer boxer.jpg

Senator Feinstein feinstein.jpg

Sister Beezlebub Scary%20Hillary%20Clinton.jpg

The ‘Magic Man’obama.jpg

You know good and gotdamn well what we heard from this collection of ‘Superclass’ sockpuppets.

(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((crickets)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

Clik on the pics to let these assclowns know how you feel.


Just another tired, old ‘Boomer’….Yeah? Well, maybe you better listen to this….

February 17, 2008

….tell ‘em Tom……

How many Obama supporters know about Kit Carson? One….Zero?


Insurrection! Edwards proposed to storm ‘Versailles’….Are you just gonna watch…..

January 12, 2008

Citizens liberate the Palace of Versailles

Folks over at dKos are stirred up about the possibility that Edwards could win. To do so he’s gonna need the netroots help. I’m already doing what I can and with some help we look to do a lot more before the CA primary. If you think that having either Clinton or Obama running against McCain/HuckaBee! is a good idea don’t let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

But…..

If your a progressive netizen who is determined to do whatever you can to help the Edwards campaign right now then check out this post and then…………

Keep an eye out here. We’re workin’ on some stuff. While you’re waiting you can send lawyers, guns and
money to JRE and EE right here….right now.


Now, Now….My good friends we have a race!

January 9, 2008

Don’t let anyone tell you the Democratic Primary is over. Don’t let anyone tell you that Clinton or Obama will now sweep to victory. That that is a outright lie should be clear by now.

Remember prior to IA how the ‘Hillary is inevitable meme was buzz, buzz, buzzing everywhere propelled by the corporatists press? Obama swatted that sucker right out of the air!

Then it was Obama, Obama, Obama will ‘run the table with the Big Mo’ he got in IA! Didn’t happen. Clinton thumped his ass in NH. Two primaries two winners.

So now it’s Edwards ‘will drop out…’. The question of ‘Who will get Edwards votes when he drops out?’ is all the corporatist media can talk about. Simple minded, lying son-of-a-bitches with their owner’s agenda, crush populism, firmly in mind they would have you believe ‘it’s all over for Edwards’. Question for ya. What do the votes of the farmers of IA and the hardy millworkers of NH, hey…I can git cliched as the next assclown who works for the NYT ala ‘Bloody Billy’ Kristol if I feel like it, count towards. What are they electing in the primary states or rather I should say who are they electing? Folks called delegates who are pledged to vote for one or another of the candidates. So, what’s the count now. Is Hillary running away with it?

Not hardly here’s the count to date:

                      NH      Total

Obama          9           25
Clinton          9           24
Edwards       4           19

Doesn’t look like no blowout to me. And one of the founders of the people-powered-politics movement Jerome Armstrong thinks its actually something pretty damn good for our nation. Here he is with the teaser quote:


‘If that’s not a race, then nothing is. Certainly, Obama and Clinton have a monetary edge over Edwards, but don’t discount earned media or Edwards having enough funds to compete well enough. All of the post-Iowa national polls have shown Edwards trending up into the 20 percents, and he’s viable. There is no frontrunner. I still predict that Clinton will ultimately win the nomination, but I care more about it being a battle in which everyone participates that wants too than I do about the ultimate Democratic nominee.’

Bold by me. Read the rest of this post here……………

And get ready for the primary cause it’s comin’ to a town near you!


Latest Polls show Edwards, not Obama, ‘Surging’ in National Polls!

January 7, 2008

Yes, outspent my hundreds of millions to tens, ‘disappeared’ by the corporatist press John Edwards surges in the polls; as this shows he’s making a move on the Clinton and Obama. Yes, while the national corporatist press is squeeling with joy about their candidate Obama Edwards is moving to spoil the corporatists party!

Apparently ‘folks’ are hearing his message even though he’s not getting his fair share of air time. Obama is the big noise. Could this have something to do with that.

Here’s JRE from today on the campaign mach in NH:

Here’s the Agonist with a rock solid post about the situation our nation really finds itself in and why. Here’s a quote:

‘The US can’t afford current policies. It’s in serious imperial overstretch, massively in debt, losing its industrial base, maintaining an army whose effectiveness is extremely questionable and losing its technological lead in multiple fields. And the "war on terror" has led to a massive increase in terrorism–it is a complete and utter failure on every metric.

Any foreign policy analyst who was actually serious, as opposed to "serious" would look at this and not be proposing more troops; would not be suggesting that the "war on terror exists". But "serious" foreign policy analysts like Obama’s and Clinton’s are doing just that.’

Read the whole thing.

Ezra Klein talk’s about ‘The Oprah Candidate’; here’s a cool segment, Klein can write no doubt about it:

Edwards ran a commercial where a burly Iowan spoke emotionally of the moment when Edwards leaned down, stared his seven-year-old son in the eyes, and promised to fight for his father’s job.

This irritates the Press Corps. It’s schmaltzy and raw. As Mark Halperin put it in his summary of Edwards’ most recent debate performance, "His habit of recounting moving stories about anonymous (and, sorry, random) people sometimes makes him sound like a mayoral candidate in a small Southern hamlet."’

Mr. Halperin is the kind of  ‘journalist’ who likes to take the easy, press release, path to a ‘story’. All that messy human emotion make him queasy in his oh, so delicate, stomach. I’d like to tell you what I really think of  the guy and his ‘colleagues’ but B.R.A.G. editorial policy now bans rough language.

What’s my point? My point fellow progressives is that, very much contrary to what you are hearing on the TeeBee and Radios ReichWing this campaign for the Democratic nomination is not, I repeat,  not over.

Not by a long shot! And you can still get in lend a hand to John and his many, many supporters.


Top 10 Myths About Iraq in 2007 from Juan Cole

December 27, 2007

Thank you, Professor Cole:

Top Ten Myths about Iraq 2007

10. Myth: The US public no longer sees Iraq as a central issue in the 2008 presidential campaign.

In a recent ABC News/ Washington Post poll, Iraq and the economy were virtually tied among voters nationally, with nearly a quarter of voters in each case saying it was their number one issue. The economy had become more important to them than in previous months (in November only 14% said it was their most pressing concern), but Iraq still rivals it as an issue!

9. Myth: There have been steps toward religious and political reconciliation in Iraq in 2007. Fact: The government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has for the moment lost the support of the Sunni Arabs in parliament. The Sunnis in his cabinet have resigned. Even some Shiite parties have abandoned the government. Sunni Arabs, who are aware that under his government Sunnis have largely been ethnically cleansed from Baghdad, see al-Maliki as a sectarian politician uninterested in the welfare of Sunnis.

8. Myth: The US troop surge stopped the civil war that had been raging between Sunni Arabs and Shiites in the Iraqi capital of Baghdad.

Fact: The civil war in Baghdad escalated during the US troop escalation. Between January, 2007, and July, 2007, Baghdad went from 65% Shiite to 75% Shiite. UN polling among Iraqi refugees in Syria suggests that 78% are from Baghdad and that nearly a million refugees relocated to Syria from Iraq in 2007 alone. This data suggests that over 700,000 residents of Baghdad have fled this city of 6 million during the US ‘surge,’ or more than 10 percent of the capital’s population. Among the primary effects of the ‘surge’ has been to turn Baghdad into an overwhelmingly Shiite city and to displace hundreds of thousands of Iraqis from the capital.

7. Myth: Iran was supplying explosively formed projectiles (a deadly form of roadside bomb) to Salafi Jihadi (radical Sunni) guerrilla groups in Iraq. Fact: Iran has not been proved to have sent weapons to any Iraqi guerrillas at all. It certainly would not send weapons to those who have a raging hostility toward Shiites. (Iran may have supplied war materiel to its client, the Supreme Islamic Council of Iraq (ISCI), which was then sold off from warehouses because of graft, going on the arms market and being bought by guerrillas and militiamen.

6. Myth: The US overthrow of the Baath regime and military occupation of Iraq has helped liberate Iraqi women. Fact: Iraqi women have suffered significant reversals of status, ability to circulate freely, and economic situation under the Bush administration.

5. Myth: Some progress has been made by the Iraqi government in meeting the “benchmarks” worked out with the Bush administration. Fact: in the words of Democratic Senator Carl Levin, “Those legislative benchmarks include approving a hydrocarbon law, approving a debaathification law, completing the work of a constitutional review committee, and holding provincial elections. Those commitments, made 1 1/2 years ago, which were to have been completed by January of 2007, have not yet been kept by the Iraqi political leaders despite the breathing space the surge has provided.”

4. Myth: The Sunni Arab “Awakening Councils,” who are on the US payroll, are reconciling with the Shiite government of PM Nuri al-Maliki even as they take on al-Qaeda remnants. Fact: In interviews with the Western press, Awakening Council tribesmen often speak of attacking the Shiites after they have polished off al-Qaeda. A major pollster working in Iraq observed,

‘ Most of the recent survey results he has seen about political reconciliation, Warshaw said, are “more about [Iraqis] reconciling with the United States within their own particular territory, like in Anbar.
. . . But it doesn’t say anything about how Sunni groups feel about Shiite groups in Baghdad.” Warshaw added: “In Iraq, I just don’t hear statements that come from any of the Sunni, Shiite or Kurdish groups that say ‘We recognize that we need to share power with the others, that we can’t truly dominate.’ ” ‘ ‘

The polling shows that “the Iraqi government has still made no significant progress toward its fundamental goal of national reconciliation.”

3. Myth: The Iraqi north is relatively quiet and a site of economic growth. Fact: The subterranean battle among Kurds, Turkmen and Arabs for control of the oil-rich Kirkuk province makes the Iraqi north a political mine field. Kurdistan now also hosts the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) guerrillas that sneak over the border and kill Turkish troops. The north is so unstable that the Iraqi north is now undergoing regular bombing raids from Turkey.

2. Myth: Iraq has been “calm” in fall of 2007 and the Iraqi public, despite some grumbling, is not eager for the US to depart. Fact: in the past 6 weeks, there have been an average of 600 attacks a month, or 20 a day, which has held steady since the beginning of November. About 600 civilians are being killed in direct political violence per month, but that number excludes deaths of soldiers and police. Across the board, Iraqis believe that their conflicts are mainly caused by the US military presence and they are eager for it to end.

1. Myth: The reduction in violence in Iraq is mostly because of the escalation in the number of US troops, or “surge.”

Fact:Although violence has been reduced in Iraq, much of the reduction did not take place because of US troop activity. Guerrilla attacks in al-Anbar Province were reduced from 400 a week to 100 a week between July, 2006 and July, 2007. But there was no significant US troop escalation in al-Anbar. Likewise, attacks on British troops in Basra have declined precipitously since they were moved out to the airport away from population centers. But this change had nothing to do with US troops.

Labels:

posted by Juan Cole @ 12/26/2007 06:35:00 AM


Iowa Action Report: Poll shows Edwards takes lead for first time.

December 18, 2007

Edwards is closing the deal.

From the latest poll out of IA by Insider Advantage we have:

Age

Gender

Total

18-29

30-44

45-64

65+

Male

Female

(Base)

(977)

(34)

(88)

(436)

(419)

(392)

(585)

%

%

%

%

%

%

%

Edwards

29.8

17.6

35.2

27.1

31.3

31.4

27.9

Clinton

26.4

26.5

15.9

28.2

38.7

26.0

35.2

Obama

24.3

35.3

35.2

19.5

12.6

19.6

17.8

Another candidate

12.1

8.8

8.0

15.4

11.9

17.6

9.9

Undecided

7.4

11.8

5.7

9.9

5.5

5.4

9.2

Edwards is also very strong in ‘second choice’.

This is a pivotal point in the crucial election. With John Edwards at the helm we can start to clean up the mess the ‘conservative’ Reich Wing of the Republican Party has made. Without him…not so much.

As far as electability goes….Edwards is the clear choice. From a new CNN poll:

"Edwards is the only Democrat who beats all four Republicans, and McCain is the only Republican who beats any of the three Democrats," Holland said. "Some might argue this shows that they are the most electable candidates in their respective parties.

So really there is only on question left, ‘What are you gonna do?’ If , perchance, you want to help JRE, and it’s not just about money, go….

Right Here!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.