Genes, infidelity and the case for poor hygene

In what I’m sure will be bad news for – well, let’s be honest – people everywhere, researchers at the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque have found that a cluster of genes known as the major histocompatibility loci, or MHC, may contribute to the probability that women will cheat on their spouses. These genes are primarily related to immune response. In fact, they’re the reason you can’t take just anybody’s liver. The above-linked study shows that may also contribute to sexual response as well. The interesting part is that these aren’t “infidelity genes”, and they don’t directly determine behavior – the study hinges on the difference between the woman’s genotype and that of her spouse. Simply put, women are more likely to cheat on men to whom they are genetically similar, while in men, there is no relationship between genotype and propensity to cheat. If you want a snarky comment, you can put it in yourself. I’m taking the high road on this one.

The ultimate explanation for this result is that more genetically different mates will produce offspring with more variable MHC genes, and therefore, stronger immune systems. Why do I bring this up? Well, one of the studies that contributed to this work just happens to be my favorite scientific study ever. It’s almost universally known in the science biz as the “sweaty tee-shirt study”. In this experiment, men and women were selected to represent a variety of MHC genotypes. The men were given clean t-shirt to wear for two nights, as which point they returned them to the scientists. The female participants then had to smell the grody t-shirts, and rate the odor in terms of – and to quote Dave Barry, I’m not making this up- “intensity, pleasantness, and sexiness”. In spite of the undeniable seductive power of underarm funk, the women in the study actually preferred the scent of t-shirts worn by men with MHC genotypes different from their own. Something to bear in mind when you head out to the bars – or to your local Drinking Liberally chapter this week.



3 Responses to Genes, infidelity and the case for poor hygene

  1. A.Citizen says:

    How does this relate to the fact that one of my favorite members of the opposite gender loves my cologne not only when it’s on me but just as much when she wears it?

    Does this mean that she’s my genetic soulmate?

    Eeech…mixed metaphor or random ethers, ketones, phenols and ethanols?

    Apparently, it’s the genetically driven lust for diversity which makes her smell ‘heavenly’ rather than the ‘True Love’ by Elizabeth Arden which she’s slathered herself with….

    I too loved that study. Shows just how much of our behavior is hard-wired. I think there would be a lot fewer disappointed humans on this planet if we realized that difficult fact.

  2. Genetics and evolution do not hold some voodoo power over us. Adulterers and addicts love to hear about such “science” as it furthers their concept that nothing is really their fault.
    Our company catches cheaters daily with our phone number search investigations. It is amazing to hear people (both the adulterer and the adulteree) pretend it is no one’s fault. THis BS genetics “finding” will only strengthen the idea that people aren’t really to blame for their infidelity.

  3. A.Citizen says:


    You don’t understand what this post is about. Please educate yourself or….

    Return to the darkness from whence you’ve slithered.

    Hint: This is not about morality.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: