Uh…Miss Nancy? Excuse me…yeah, I know you are very busy……

May 4, 2008

planning the next great big give away to your corporate pals, gonna be hard to top the farm bill that’s for sure, but…well, you see…What with:

Impeachment of the table….

Another 178 Billion for Bush’s excellent adventure….

No action on literally dozens of folks accused of everything from child rape to big time embezzlement to a guy changing legislation after it was sighed by your best pal Mr. Decider…..

Some have made up their minds like this lady:

That it’s time for you to go. Go away where you can no longer damage the Democratic Party, no longer damage our nation, no longer damage our society.

As mah cousin Pat allu sez: ‘Don’t let the door  knob hit ya where the good Lord split ya!’ on your way out.


Intoducing a Blogger I find to be very, very good….

April 21, 2008

She is to be found at: Anglachel’s Journal ‘You say I’m a bitch as if that were a bad thing…’ obviously a lady who is not…shy. She’s going on the blogroll, soon to be purged of sexist scumbags and other pests, but here’s an introductory post about….heh…..History….snort….yeah, one of my favorite subjects. Hey, read yer Santana.

‘Why am I so concerned about the way “radical” and “far left liberal” are being used in the blogs? First, I’m kind of pedantic when it comes to political definitions. These things mean something to me in a way they might not to ordinary readers. They have histories, they refer to specific modes of thought and action, and they are intended to have analytic power. More importantly, as I ended the last post, these labels have been used maliciously against Democrats by the Right in an attempt to distract voters from the core policies and actions of the party, measures that are far more harmful to Republican power than some upper-class idiot with too much time on his hands pretending he’s a “revolutionary” and killing people. It matters that we use language correctly and understand the various radical modes of action on the Left so that we can be effective radicals ourselves. In the current political environment, to promote humane, egalitarian and moderate policies is to be radical.’

Bold by me. Clik on thru and read the whole thing. She’s a very good writer indeed and comes to us from riverdaughter over at The Confluence which as you know, if you’ve been keeping track that is, is a blog resulting from the progressive radiation away from such cesspools ad dKos, TPM and OpenLeft. I’m really looking forward to reading more from her. Beats the sound of Barry sticking one of his feet in his mouth.

Flash Update: She, uppity bitch, defines Barry in terms of her Truman/Stephenson model. Sadly, Barry does not fare well here.


I’m Sick, Tired and Disgusted….

April 17, 2008

From the ‘Boyz on the Blogz’ naive outrage at how their guy, Barry, was treated in the latest debate, hey lots of us have been saying, ‘Look out the corporatist media is just biding their time and then the ‘Clinton Rules’ will become ‘Barry’s Bylaws’. So it happened and the ‘Big Men’ of the ‘sphere are outraged.

So what?

Due to headache and other issues I will not bore you with I’m gonna play A-Lister and just give you few linkys to play with:

Uh….oh, and I do mean this….. Do you have your two weeks supply of food, water and medicine? Some ammo would not hurt.

But things are just hunkey-dorey in Miss Nancy’s House….. I suggest massive doses of this to make ya feel a bit better.

Well, at least the economy is settly down…rigtht? Right?...Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight?

Looks like Barry might have some work to do on that Unity thingy……. warning if you don’t think there are some
truly enraged White People out there do not clik on this link. And no, don’t blame me. I’ve been listening to this for 45 years.

Why McSame looks so cool, calm and collected as he fumbles question after question…..

Ahnuld nears success in the ‘conservative’ ‘War on Education’ they’ve been waging for 50 years.

RiverDaughter asks, nicely, what do Obamaphiles want?

Hopefully more substance soon. Gonna be writing a lot since the number of sites I’m welcome at is…..heh…heh…shrinking


This Speaks for Itself. The Message is Unacceptable to me. What Say You?

April 16, 2008

First listen to this admitted war criminal spew lies…..

Then go here to speak out…..and demand that the national media do the same!

Or prepare to live as slaves of  the corporate state.


‘I think it depends on why he thinks he needs to do that.’

April 9, 2008

That’s Professor of Law at Boalt Hall School John You asking the question at the end of this clip.

Me?

I’m pretty sure President George W. Bush would have a very, very good reason to have your child’s testicles crushed for the sake of National Security.

Aren’t you?


Looseheadprop over at FDL is analyzing the vile Professor Yoo’s ‘legal’ memos telling the vicious war criminal Boosh he can torture you to his heart’s content…

April 3, 2008

Nice eh?

Here’s a teaser para:

‘Today, I’m just going to explain some basics about legal writing. Legal writing, like any other scholarly writing, requires the author to support contentions of “fact” with citations to the source of the writer’s information.

There are two kinds of “facts” that require citation. The first is facts as the term is generally used. So, if you are writing a brief, an opinion letter, an internal memo, or a judge’s opinion and you mention a fact, you should include a citation to the testimony, document, or other piece of evidence that supplied that fact. So, for example, if I wrote “John Smith arrived home at 2pm. Deposition testimony of John Smith at page 62.” I would be demonstrating that my “fact” about John Smith’s whereabouts at 2 PM came from page 62 of his own testimony.

The other kind of “fact” that requires a citation is the fact of the state of the law. Specifically, if I want to assert that federal grand jury testimony is to be kept secret by the government prior to indictment, I would cite rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, or I could cite a case that says that, or a learned treatise, or a law review article. (Yes, there are other authoritative sources, this list is not exclusive or exhaustive.)

In a well written brief or opinion, every single assertion of fact or law has a citation to support it. There are very few that actually meet this standard of perfection, but that is more often a function of limited time. At the very least, you MUST MUST MUST support your major points.

The Yoo memo, as you will see in later posts, completely lacks any citation whatsoever for the most sweeping and outrageous claims. Small wonder, since I doubt he could find any law or case that even came close to some of his nuttier propositions.’

Go on over and read the rest. This is just the first of several posts LHP will be doing and I think you will find his work highly informative.

The vile Yoo is still happliy ensconced at UCB ‘teaching’ ‘law’ at Boalt Hall.

Here’s Professor Christopher Edley, Jr. current Dean of Boalt lawschool’s email address if you’d like to send you thoughts on this really lousy lawyer, for he is that in addition to being a vile sack of human waste, still getting paid by the taxpayers of California to ‘teach’.

‘Teach what?’ is one question I’d ask Ol’ Dean Edley Jr.


Lady’s and Gentleman, The President of the United States

March 31, 2008

Laura was so proud she washed another handful of Xanax down with her Grey Goose….

He probably thinks they’re yelling ‘Booosh…..Boooosh…..’